Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160518
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '19 at 21:37
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 76.2 1-Core 96 2-Core 202 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 385 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 30 Parallax 35.6 30% 34.3 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 34.6 26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 35 37 33 34 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 454 Write 419 Mixed 308 SusWrite 65.6 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 39.6 145% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 313 241% 329 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 124GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 45 55 59 66 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 163 Write 153 Mixed 106 SusWrite 65.9 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GB 1,739 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.2% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.9 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,186x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	572x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	77x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	73x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	380x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	728x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	96x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16