| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 25 '19 at 19:51 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
82% 151 Pts
|
71% 571 Pts
|
42% 682 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.3
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
19% 23.8 fps
|
18% 21.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingdian S200 60GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFCBBT3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 196 199 196 172 MB/s
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
59% 267 MB/s
|
143% 53.4 MB/s
|
113% 160 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 208 205 208 207 208 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
122% 167 MB/s
|
163% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-3G2E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
73.1%
Very good
|
70% 24.3 GB/s
|
89% 31.3 GB/s
|
44% 90 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 478x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 384x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 311x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $280 |