Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 10:08
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$209
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
98% 174 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 941
96% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,191
80% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 428
Reflection 335
Parallax 414
112% 392 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 388
Splatting 240
115% 340 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$60
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,604
Write 2,043
Mixed 1,546
457% 2,064 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 97.6
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 1,477
DQ Mixed 1166
903% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 166% Great: 277%
Plextor PX-256M9PeG 256GB
95GB free
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 251 273 247 261 266 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,999
Write 994
Mixed 1,060
SusWrite 294
240% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 89.2
306% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 783
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 717
590% 833 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 233%
Great: 218%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 121 121 118 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 74.2
Write 91
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 119
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 47.7
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 43.9
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 29,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $188

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback