Guoshuo X58

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Guoshuo X58 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170807
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '19 at 19:05
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5640 649 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 133 57% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 291 32% 253 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 13 12% 13.5 fps	MRender 18.9 Gravity 16.4 Splatting 14.9 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: C3G SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 103 104 102 100 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 155 Write 123 Mixed 138 SusWrite 100 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 18.1 67% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 119 93% 128 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 698GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 104 118 113 119 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 138 Write 122 Mixed 71 SusWrite 113 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 430GB free Firmware: 0002BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 69 69 70 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 66.3 Write 65.2 Mixed 36 SusWrite 67.7 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 460GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 54 54 56 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 59 Write 82.8 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 52.8 46% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 94%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 12GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 20 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 9.4 25% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1 74% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 42%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 495GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 28.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 10.5 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 23%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 4TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3TB free, PID 01f7 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 53 54 52 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 76.5 Write 104 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 51.1 101% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 80%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 197GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 29GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 71 Write 31.5 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 10.6 46% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.3 126% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 41GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.2 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Guoshuo X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	4x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	4x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	2x
512GB 512GBDogfishBench 70%, 457 samples	2x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	6x
KKX1866C10D3/8G MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 39%, 6 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH9 MXIC 25L8005 41GBSamsungBench 38%, 29 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16