Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	$(default_string) nT-iBR30_nT-iBR31_nT-iBR37 (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn BWN01
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '19 at 11:04
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 31 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 33.6 19% 28.1 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 37.2 5% 39.1 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(105B 0E66) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 2.34 1% 1.81 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 1.96 1% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 51 44 52 52 55 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.6% Poor	Read 246 Write 57.1 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 46.2 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 13.5 33% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB 884 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 1.5 8% 2.73 GB/s	Latency 249 16% 249 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16