Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 02:16
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 433
60% 443 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 145
Parallax 124
108% 134 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 108
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1163 1185 612 614 617 611 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,510
Write 1,425
Mixed 721
SusWrite 800
249% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 49.3
171% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 1,144
DQ Mixed 980
772% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 211%
Great: 254%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
35GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 90 101 101 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 150
Write 126
Mixed 147
SusWrite 96
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 33.1
142% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 124
94% 128 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
360GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 415 444 461 464 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 447
Mixed 433
SusWrite 438
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59.1
202% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 337
254% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
180GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 112 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 168
Write 128
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 111
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 109%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
210GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 86
Write 83.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 87.2
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback