Asus P9X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131015
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '19 at 22:36
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 96 2-Core 151 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 333 37% 289 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 64 66 59 59 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.4% Above average	Read 241 Write 85.5 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 63.9 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 22.6 94% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 49.2 DQ Mixed 66.2 80% 149 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 110%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 189GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 207 218 213 209 209 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.2% Good	Read 218 Write 215 Mixed 202 SusWrite 211 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 36.3 121% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 179 140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 68GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 137 120 126 123 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 404 Write 271 Mixed 286 SusWrite 156 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 35.8 124% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 228 206% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	652x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	361x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	230x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	85x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	53x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	52x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	53x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	38x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16