Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8320E-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41% Average
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 116
43% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 364
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 351
24% 351 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$700
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 339
Reflection 320
Parallax 475
89% 378 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 387
Splatting 219
110% 314 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 263 328 348 367 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 147
Write 57.5
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 327
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 9
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 9.3
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 11.6
9% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88
282GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 613 913 787 790 791 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,255
Write 1009
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 797
230% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 63.8
207% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 413
310% 414 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 182%
Great: 324%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$52
523GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 140 132 147 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 159
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 145
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F6451U67G1600G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 3,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback