Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 02:57
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 406
47% 365 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Device(0000 0000) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 5.19
9% 8.64 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 8.93
Splatting 6.61
7% 8.32 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM05.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Below average
Read 155
Write 101
Mixed 104
SusWrite 101
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 20.9
84% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 23.2
24% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
12GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 46.9
Write 21.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 61.5
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 37%
WD WD75 00AARS-00Y5B 750GB
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 35
Mixed 29.1
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.2 4.4 4.4 4 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Read 8
Write 5.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.3
9% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 16.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback