PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P31-DS3L (all builds) |
Memory | 0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20071002 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 22 '19 at 20:26 |
Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 79% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 10x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 6x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 5x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |