Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 870 Extreme3 (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 560 1,794 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 39.1 2-Core 72.4 44% 64.6 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 93.4 12% 88.8 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% POV(1ACC 4514) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 5.69 3% 4.84 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 2.61 4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 35 55 63 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 80.3 Write 72.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 56.6 46% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 54%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.2 7 6 7 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	Read 20 Write 13 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 6.1 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 33% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x4GB 5,816 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 193 samples	3x
R7 250AMDBench 8%, 25,802 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	2x

RAM
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 F3-16000CL9-2GBRH0 4GBUnknownBench 31%, 4 samples	2x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 50%, 4 samples	2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $111

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16