Asus P5L-MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus P5L-MX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5L-MX
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 17:58
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 43.7
26% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 66.8
8-Core 66.1
9% 66.4 Pts
64-Core 65.7
4% 65.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4650
AMD(1002 2542) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 2.91
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 4.09
2% 2.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$35
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 14 18 9.7 37 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 192
Write 43.3
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 27.7
17% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 11.2
48% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 21.2
DQ Mixed 17
13% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 93%
Maxtor 6E040L0 41GB-$27
5GB free
Firmware: NAR61590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 47 45 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 42.4
Write 41.1
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 47.6
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 32%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
900GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 16 19 13 43 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 150
Write 128
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 32.5
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 2.1
382% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 111%
WD Elements 500GB
130GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 22.3
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.88% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.1
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5L-MX Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P5L-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback