Asrock J4105M

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105M (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '19 at 15:39
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 44.8 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 104 39% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 42%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2.41 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 6.52 4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 2%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 17.8 15% 17 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 19.6 15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 393 391 213 206 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 442 Write 382 Mixed 367 SusWrite 293 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 26.6 118% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 47.9 100% 200 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 92%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 167GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 117 136 123 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 406 Write 230 Mixed 252 SusWrite 165 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 13.9 57% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 42.3 49% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 2,734 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 11.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105M

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	22x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	14x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBGigabyte $30Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
M500 120GBCrucial $75Bench 66%, 15,430 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GBSK_HynixBench 29%, 7 samples	3x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 28%, 2 samples	2x
PSD44G240081 1x4GBPatriotBench 41%, 314 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $30

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16