Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120402
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '19 at 11:19
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G530-$40 3,833 User benchmarks, average bench 46% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 108 52% 82 Pts	4-Core 99 8-Core 104 13% 101 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.88 1% 1.04 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB 5,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0200Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 20 20 20 21 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.5% Poor	Read 52.7 Write 29 Mixed 41 SusWrite 21 8% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 6.5 56% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 19.2 45% 101 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 79%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 676GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 102 99 102 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 105 Write 108 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 99.8 68% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 86%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB 4,921 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 210GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 25 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 25.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 24.4 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 49%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 27GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.8 2.9 2.5 2.7 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Read 12.8 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.6 6% 5.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 2x2GB 2,085 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.9% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	25x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	19x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	49x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	8x
GeForce 405NvidiaBench 1%, 1,861 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	17x
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 Apacer 78.C1GET.AU10C M378B5773DH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 4 samples	4x
99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 48%, 5 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16