| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160329 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 22 '19 at 06:47 |
| Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 76% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.3%
Good
|
60% 97.2 Pts
|
44% 360 Pts
|
27% 441 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.1%
Very good
|
52% 105 fps
|
106% 131 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 598 620 138 258 275 MB/s
|
||||
|
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
159GB free
Firmware: MN5OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 49 8.5 14 20 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
35% 47 MB/s
|
93% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37
2.5TB free
Firmware: MKAONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 138 23 39 52 MB/s
|
67.8%
Good
|
83% 113 MB/s
|
167% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.5%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
| FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $657 |