Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 73 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 648 63% 517 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 63.2 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 55.8 52% 61.3 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 58.7 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,002 Write 449 Mixed 268 125% 573 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 47.7 170% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 663 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 356 284% 411 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 144%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30 34,154 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4GB free Firmware: SM11 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 87.5 Write 88.5 Mixed 52 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.8 345% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 2x8GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 29.5 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 23.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	44x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	24x

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $439

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16