Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q5010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q5010  (all builds)
MotherboardAOpen D2544-B1
Memory0.6 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 00:18
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400-$110
Socket 479, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 46.2
30% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 47
6% 48 Pts
64-Core 48.6
3% 48.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 119
SusWrite 117
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 18.9
63% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 91.7
71% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 77%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3 4.2 4.2 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 16.9
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.1
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback