Asus P7F7-E WS SUPERCOMPUTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7F7-E WS SUPERCOMPUTER  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 118
55% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 340
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 67.6
62% 73.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 72.5
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 86 80 78 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 148
Write 116
Mixed 137
SusWrite 79.9
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 29.3
28% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 83%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 79 80 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 90.2
Write 88.3
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 77.8
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
52GB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 18.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 44.5
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
181GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 51
Write 29.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 44.3
31% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
448GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 85 87 81 80 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 82
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 84.2
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7F7-E WS SUPERCOMPUTER Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P7F7-E WS SUPERCOMPUTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback