HP CQ1120FR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP CQ1120FR  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ACA
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 18.1
2-Core 39.1
27% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 38.8
5% 37.4 Pts
64-Core 37.2
2% 37.2 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 2ACA) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.35
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.26
1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx3 0 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 136 156 162 142 192 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 210
Write 199
Mixed 196
SusWrite 157
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 16.5
55% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 85.3
64% 86.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
764GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 131 133 123 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 135
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 128
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
73GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 10 9.5 7.2 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 11.3
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 10.1
19% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
101% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
47GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 2.4 8 2.5 7.4 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 17
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 7
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ1120FR Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ1120FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback