Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 80 2-Core 155 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 277 37% 275 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.59 3% 4.04 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 96 56 91 79 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 122 Write 128 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 80 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 105GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 92 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 66 SusWrite 93.6 67% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.7 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $312

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16