Dell Latitude E6430

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Latitude E6430 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0CPWYR
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181130
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '19 at 04:10
Run Duration	337 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 76.9 49% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 150 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 0534) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 3.31 4% 4.37 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.74 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 124GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 148 162 154 149 151 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.3% Above average	Read 268 Write 254 Mixed 267 SusWrite 145 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 19.8 64% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 46.8 95% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 186 127 169 185 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 253 Write 255 Mixed 239 SusWrite 164 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 17.8 58% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 41.2 72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 133%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB 1,074 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 1.5 2.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 15.3 Write 11.8 SusWrite 3.1 11% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 23%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 171GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 15 14 15 14 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 64.5 Write 61 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 17.1 58% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 47%
WDC WD20 EARX-00MMMB0 2TB 645GB free, PID 55aa SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 37 34 38 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.8% Poor	Read 76 Write 69 Mixed 26 SusWrite 38.4 66% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s

ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free, PID 2773 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 54 49 55 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 42 Write 82.6 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 52.5 73% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 161% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 87%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 775GB free, PID 2773 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 21 20 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 75.4 Write 74.3 Mixed 41 SusWrite 20.8 67% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 45%
USB Flash Disk 129GB 236 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 120GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 28 26 28 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 30 Mixed 32 SusWrite 26 41% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.9 116% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 79GB free, PID ab24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 85 91 80 89 90 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 82 Write 80.3 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 85 102% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 55%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1.5TB free, PID ab38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 54 45 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 110 Write 105 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 50.1 106% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.2 178% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 284GB free, PID ab38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 73 58 69 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 48.5 Write 67 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 67 82% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.4 148% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB 18,159 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.8% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Latitude E6430 Builds (Compare 1,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6430

CPU
Core i5-3340MIntelBench 53%, 12,487 samples	266x
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	236x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	105x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	968x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	156x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	18x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	30x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16