Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120424
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '19 at 00:10
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 505 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Lighting 25.9 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 31 21% 28.2 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 32.8 22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 225GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 85 86 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 113 Write 122 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 85.7 65% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 108%
D2CSTK251A20-0240 240GB 34GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 125 141 141 140 129 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 58GB free, PID 6300, adata UV128 64G USB 3.2 gen1 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 20 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 108 Write 36.2 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 21.1 49% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK64V6H 2x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 18.1 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.9 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	187x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	20x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16