Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 00:09
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 103
50% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 276
29% 231 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 69.6
62% 71.3 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 52.2
44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 319 310 305 307 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 319
Write 299
Mixed 264
SusWrite 312
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.7
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 54.9
46% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
254GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 73.3
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 12.5
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 10.7
16% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 105%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 01ea
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 23.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 19.6
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback