Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350E7C-A01US
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '19 at 20:39
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 154 53% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 427 42% 346 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0DC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 2.75 3% 3.58 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.04 4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 231 233 238 241 241 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.2% Very good	Read 252 Write 241 Mixed 231 SusWrite 234 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 37.7 125% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 124%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 397GB free Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 394 144 174 174 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 442 Write 417 Mixed 340 SusWrite 242 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 22.9 77% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 197 190% 299 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 32 Write 18.2 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 12.3 26% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.5 110% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 31 Write 18.8 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 12.3 24% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.4 122% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8 33,725 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 25GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 12.1 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.3 144% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 15.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	157x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	154x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	115x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	536x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	37x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	19x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	113x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	36x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $81

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16