PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z75 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120314 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 20 '19 at 20:27 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 380 336 200 157 133 MB/s
|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
13GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 98 92 100 MB/s
|
66%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
59GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 11 12 11 13 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
59GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 12 12 11 12 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 76x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 71x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $466 |