Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190628
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 84.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 258 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 1,007 89% 753 Pts	64-Core 2,322 144% 2,322 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8663) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 158 Parallax 167 140% 166 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 139 Splatting 106 112% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1993 1529 2018 1810 1799 1732 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 2,065 Write 1,941 Mixed 570 SusWrite 1,813 358% 1,597 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 55.7 219% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 815 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 667 499% 671 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 425%
Seagate ST3500514NS 500GB-$19 1,968 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 7GB free Firmware: SN11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 82 82 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 64 SusWrite 87.9 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 75%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 32GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 88 89 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 83 Write 79.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 89.7 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.7% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 17.3 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 10.3 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	59x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	53x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	44x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	46x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	20x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 91%, 1,779 samples	20x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16