Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 13:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 312
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 931
96% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1301 MHz, MLim: 2078 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 80.2
52% 70.3 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 64
Splatting 55.4
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 726
Write 481
Mixed 237
106% 481 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 34.5
161% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 213
199% 310 MB/s
Poor: 96% Great: 235%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
35GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 382 418 394 434 396 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 423
Mixed 312
SusWrite 407
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 39.6
157% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 252
210% 300 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$117
66GB free
Firmware: AUF02A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 79 67 55 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 153
Write 84
Mixed 106
SusWrite 69.7
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 16.5
2,810% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 25
DQ Mixed 26.3
245% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 33 34 33 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 137
Write 39.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 32.2
63% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.9
138% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback