Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U 3,165 User benchmarks, average bench 55% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 68 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 188 64% 115 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 372 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU) 2,318 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(1854 0342) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.50.12.04 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 13 Parallax 13 0% 8.66 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 15.3 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.36% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1009 128GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6104009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 111 111 111 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 458 Write 283 Mixed 249 SusWrite 114 61% 276 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 27.3 105% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 183 144% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 84%
SSD 256GB 6,980 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 121GB free Firmware: S8FM08.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 370 359 358 361 336 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 389 Write 346 Mixed 231 SusWrite 357 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 12.7 48% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 55.5 71% 126 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 20.7 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 18.5 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16