Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 12:10
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.5% Good
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
78% 166 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 330
45% 329 Pts
64-Core 322
22% 322 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Lighting 536
Reflection 466
Parallax 573
141% 525 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 242
Splatting 263
71% 250 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 145%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 151 155 161 159 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 190
Mixed 390
SusWrite 178
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 50.4
170% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 365
273% 362 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 119%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$108
280GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 392 395 434 440 501 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 765
Write 926
Mixed 772
SusWrite 458
165% 730 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 44.1
158% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 681
522% 718 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 140%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown HX2666CX15D4/4G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB HX2666CX15D4/4G Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 16GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 21
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,809 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback