PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120809 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 20 '19 at 07:12 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 048F) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.2
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marvell Raid VD 0 247GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 117 177 156 49 68 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
SSD 240GB
101GB free
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
246GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 605x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 291x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $380 |