Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8350-$75
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.8% Average
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 130
47% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 248
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 253
17% 253 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 184
Reflection 153
Parallax 239
48% 192 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 163
Splatting 172
45% 153 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$85
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 137 134 133 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 326
Write 154
Mixed 207
SusWrite 135
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 36.7
135% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 171
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 89%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$85
64GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 148 148 148 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 401
Write 156
Mixed 220
SusWrite 143
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 34.2
120% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 184
141% 193 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
226GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 46.9
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 54
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-1600C9-8GXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 14.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 12,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $762
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback