Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 130
62% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 248
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 253
17% 253 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 184
Reflection 153
Parallax 239
48% 192 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 163
Splatting 172
45% 153 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$179
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 137 134 133 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 326
Write 154
Mixed 207
SusWrite 135
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 36.7
135% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 171
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 88%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$179
64GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 148 148 148 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 401
Write 156
Mixed 220
SusWrite 143
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 34.2
120% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 184
141% 193 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
226GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 46.9
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 54
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-1600C9-8GXM Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 14.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $740
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $180Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback