Packard EasyNote TJ75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TJ75  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TJ75
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 06:56
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 480
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 122
51% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 178
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 033D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-120 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 108 38 29 34 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 216
Write 197
Mixed 181
SusWrite 49.8
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 15.3
63% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 59.8
83% 153 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JSF25664HY-1G1D1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TJ75 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TJ75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback