Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2600K-$145
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
65.6% Good
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 192
68% 145 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 483
56% 424 Pts
64-Core 439
29% 439 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$289
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2182 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 175
Reflection 165
Parallax 171
46% 170 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 165
Splatting 137
46% 142 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
128GB 127GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0821D
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 482
Write 440
Mixed 352
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 39.8
128% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 55
112% 224 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 106%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$24
5GB free
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 65 51 64 57 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 61.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 52.6
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
104GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 112 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.8
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 104
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
11GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 12 12 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 7.8
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 10.2
19% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
111% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 1,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $749
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback