Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 21:58
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
1-Core 129
2-Core 259
91% 194 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 925
91% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,405
94% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$505
Asus(1043 8706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 406
Reflection 326
Parallax 433
107% 388 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 337
Splatting 213
98% 288 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 120%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$120
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 914 771 565 559 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 934
Mixed 845
SusWrite 684
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 58.5
194% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 1129
DQ Mixed 1,216
911% 1,214 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 209%
Great: 336%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$230
91GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 249 236 237 231 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.4% Good
Read 239
Write 213
Mixed 174
SusWrite 236
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 31.2
104% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 123%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$37
393GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 85 84 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 85.2
Write 75.3
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 84.4
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$69
478GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 110 109 109 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 128
Write 88.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 112
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 40.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 36.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 126%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 14,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback