Lenovo 3177A15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3177A15  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111026
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 94.9
53% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 134
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 307C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 62 61 62 26 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 95
Write 90.7
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 46.3
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F Samsung M391B5773CH0-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback