Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 19:59
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3820-$390
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
62.3% Good
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 189
68% 143 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 476
52% 404 Pts
64-Core 494
33% 494 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Device(1545 7750) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 46
8% 37.3 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 37.4
8% 30.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$60
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 299 283 269 265 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 491
Write 453
Mixed 330
SusWrite 280
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 31.6
107% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 180
142% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 131%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
164GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 1096 780 571 569 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2,196
Write 1,715
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 738
337% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 50.2
153% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 345
283% 417 MB/s
Poor: 181%
This bench: 201%
Great: 317%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
585GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 87 86 85 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 86.5
Write 72.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 84.4
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
207GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 86 86 85 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 141
Write 132
Mixed 70
SusWrite 86
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 113 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 105
SusWrite 110
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 3,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $1,276
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback