Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

19 days ago, 18 days ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 112,215 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	62.1% Good	1-Core 93.1 2-Core 182 65% 138 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 349 48% 351 Pts	64-Core 356 24% 356 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 268,973 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 133 Reflection 110 Parallax 140 35% 128 fps	MRender 81.1 Gravity 121 Splatting 82.5 33% 94.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 21,517 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 305 308 306 306 306 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 448 Write 310 Mixed 281 SusWrite 306 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 21.7 83% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 81.6 DQ Mixed 131 111% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$67 23,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 356GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 65 64 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 39.3 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 61.9 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 5,160 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 867GB free Firmware: ML6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 93 92 94 99 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 102 Write 85 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 94.2 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 3,954 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 1,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $300Bench 67%, 132,550 samples	441x
Core i7-3770Intel $198Bench 64%, 150,355 samples	168x
Core i7-3770KIntel $138Bench 68%, 99,740 samples	155x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $280Bench 57%, 752,541 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $399Bench 52%, 512,504 samples	98x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $183Bench 54%, 310,616 samples	87x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,957 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $97Bench 113%, 414,632 samples	74x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $60Bench 108%, 221,879 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 49%, 50,130 samples	52x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 53,360 samples	49x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 49%, 19,007 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $635

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	AMD RX 590 $180	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360	Nvidia RTX 2060 $324	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24