Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E (all builds)
Memory	18.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '19 at 13:35
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 403 45% 353 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31% Below average	Lighting 37.1 Reflection 34.4 Parallax 48.6 30% 40 fps	MRender 47.9 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 31.9 32% 40.8 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 45 40 30 41 75 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 185 Write 41.3 Mixed 128 SusWrite 55 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 30.7 102% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 84 DQ Mixed 90.5 70% 97 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 118%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 166GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 77.5 Mixed 36.8 43% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 26.6 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 28.9 20% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 255% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 20GB 10,519 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	257x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	156x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	45x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	43x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	23x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	325x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	230x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16