Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 75 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 200 64% 115 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 181 46% 301 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B 3454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 31.4 27% 30.8 fps	MRender 35.9 Gravity 34.2 Splatting 29.9 27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 866GB free (System drive) Firmware: 16.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 92 41 22 88 121 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 1x4GB 1,273 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 5 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 0.7 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	660x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	245x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	227x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,517 samples	329x
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	314x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 44%, 10,608 samples	198x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $256

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16