Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 10:24
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 196
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 782
69% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 157
84% 116 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 121
Splatting 126
93% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,423
Write 2,236
Mixed 1,572
462% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 69.5
231% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 709
512% 668 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Addlink SATA SSD 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 62 94 50 47 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 73.3
Write 161
Mixed 283
SusWrite 92.7
35% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 19.3
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 87.5
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 82.4
63% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
313GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 144
Write 111
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 120
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
26GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 153 155 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 101
SusWrite 154
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2933C15D4/8GX 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 28.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback