Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago, 24 days ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270P-D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	6.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '19 at 10:15
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i5-7500-$200 82,815 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	65.6% Good	1-Core 106 2-Core 197 72% 151 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 360 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 397 27% 397 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$170 319,473 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Lighting 192 Reflection 168 Parallax 251 50% 204 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 183 Splatting 123 51% 149 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$53 32,541 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 228 258 258 245 267 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 221 Write 102 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 244 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 10.7 46% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.9 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 16.4 13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 358,747 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 453GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 159 159 157 158 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 141 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 158 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 2,924 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 18 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 18 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 4,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $378Bench 87%, 345,135 samples	1,311x
Core i5-7600KIntel $251Bench 82%, 124,193 samples	1,078x
Core i7-7700Intel $307Bench 75%, 121,955 samples	407x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $289Bench 57%, 731,336 samples	665x
GTX 1070Nvidia $415Bench 78%, 671,944 samples	617x
GTX 1080Nvidia $445Bench 105%, 561,146 samples	507x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,075 samples	254x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $87Bench 112%, 375,272 samples	199x
A400 120GBKingston $22Bench 59%, 60,851 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 84%, 269,498 samples	366x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 76%, 43,284 samples	150x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $60Bench 72%, 56,634 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $785

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	AMD RX 590 $180	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24