Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 03:23
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$300
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
92% 197 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 939
91% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,432
96% 1,432 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 99.5
20% 83.4 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 75.2
18% 64.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
113GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 335 331 320 321 318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 337
Mixed 297
SusWrite 326
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 40.7
145% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 154
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
58GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 114 134 45 83 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 463
Write 197
Mixed 235
SusWrite 107
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 14.8
77% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 29.6
66% 136 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 72%
SABRENT 1TB
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1770 874 911 880 906 891 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$99
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 72
Write 71
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 78.5
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$40
85GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 56.7
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 69.7
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 35.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 38
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91%
Great: 136%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 131%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $890
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $645SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback