Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 02:02
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 141
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 465
42% 351 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Sapphire(174B E253) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 36.8
23% 32.3 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 33.6
24% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 5.1 23 96 64 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42% Average
Read 406
Write 269
Mixed 180
SusWrite 81.1
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 14.5
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 25.8
38% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 55%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 58GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 74 74 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 202
Write 79.2
Mixed 103
SusWrite 74.9
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 15.2
51% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 29.7
DQ Mixed 18
15% 21 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 28.9
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 65%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
6GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.5
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 38
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 50%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
83GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 74 74 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 141
Write 131
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 75.1
146% 111 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback