| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080820 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '19 at 01:27 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.6%
Average
|
38% 62.1 Pts
|
22% 158 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
17% 18.4 fps
|
16% 20.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$35
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.3 25 17 5.4 1.8 MB/s
|
4% 20.2 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
16% 5.57 GB/s
|
13% 4.47 GB/s
|
29% 137 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 406 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 75x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |