Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 20:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8320-$163
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.8% Below average
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 102
42% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 182
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 216
14% 216 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$340
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 224
Reflection 255
Parallax 698
59% 392 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 341
Splatting 304
92% 287 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 97%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD PLUS 480GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 273 281 283 281 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 371
Write 360
Mixed 204
SusWrite 273
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 31.7
102% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.6
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 31.6
31% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
225GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 787 412 413 414 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,306
Write 1,033
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 515
217% 970 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 69.1
225% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 433
326% 439 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 174%
Great: 289%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
361GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 131 133 130 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 165
Write 109
Mixed 126
SusWrite 134
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1600 CL10 Series BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1600 CL10 Series 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback