MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 710
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 49.4
Parallax 32.3
20% 35.3 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 47.1
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 112 109 149 142 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 371
Mixed 320
SusWrite 130
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.1
191% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 295
221% 298 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
114GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 114 110 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 109
66% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 103%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
310GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 121
Write 107
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 103
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
587GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70% Good
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 78
SusWrite 101
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
10GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.4 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 10.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.8
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 9%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22ZAT0 500GB
266GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 27.6
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 36.2
40% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 37.8
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback