MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.7% Very good
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
82% 174 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 704
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 941
63% 941 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$390
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 128
Parallax 104
19% 102 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 108
26% 102 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$205
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 112 109 149 142 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 371
Mixed 320
SusWrite 130
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.1
191% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 295
221% 298 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$18
114GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 114 110 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 109
66% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 101%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
310GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 121
Write 107
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 103
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$94
587GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70% Good
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 78
SusWrite 101
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 89%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
10GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.4 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 10.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.8
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
47% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 9%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22ZAT0 500GB
266GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 37 36 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 27.6
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 36.2
40% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3400 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 37.8
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 17,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,076
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $175Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback