Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '19 at 11:27
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 535 54% 437 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 824GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 76 98 98 87 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 25.5 Write 85.1 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 89.9 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 19.4 Mixed 1 7% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0N 2x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 18.1 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16