Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 175 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 700 61% 521 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57% Above average	Lighting 72.4 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 64 59% 69.6 fps	MRender 74.8 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 56.6 53% 66 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 225 229 235 242 230 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 412 Write 255 Mixed 167 SusWrite 219 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 60.7 4K Mixed 24.6 96% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 94.7 DQ Mixed 30 32% 51 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 88%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 64GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 55GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 28.1 Mixed 6 SusWrite 27.6 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 74% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 2x8GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 10.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16