Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 156%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 00:13
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-9900KS-$680
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
110% 232 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,232
114% 925 Pts
64-Core 1689
113% 1689 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 33
Parallax 29.3
6% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 36.3
7% 27.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$210
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2437 2239 1528 1502 1489 1481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,609
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 1,779
414% 1,855 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 90.4
298% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1550
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,374
1,044% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 369%
Great: 375%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$210
744GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2501 2195 1413 1413 1430 1444 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 2,486
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 1,732
413% 1,823 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 96
316% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,361
DQ Mixed 1,483
1,108% 1,475 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 336%
Great: 375%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$450
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2497 2498 2499 1598 1345 1320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 1,734
Mixed 1,421
SusWrite 1,959
382% 1,694 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 94.2
312% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,361
DQ Mixed 1,458
1,098% 1,470 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 349%
Great: 391%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
30GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 7.3 3.9 11 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 18.7
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 7.6
24% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
77% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
72.7% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 128%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 8,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 148%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $2,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback