Asus X705UD

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus X705UD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705UD
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190416
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	50%
CPU Throttled	93%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 128 57% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 171 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 1B30) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3648 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.45% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 3.34 2% 3.45 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 3.35 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 2.45% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 85 69 59 64 64 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 93.3 Write 93.2 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 74.2 19% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 15.4 68% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 121 115% 185 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 138GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 49 39 37 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 62.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 43.2 36% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.4 121% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.6% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705UD Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UD

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	14x
Core i7-7500U VHIntelBench 52%, 2,074 samples	4x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	3x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	17x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	5x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	5x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	3x
WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TBWDCBench 96%, 39,874 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	15x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	3x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 69%, 1,506 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16